<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Image Thievery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hauteshots.com/blog/2010/01/09/image-thievery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hauteshots.com/blog/2010/01/09/image-thievery/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:25:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: stacie</title>
		<link>http://www.hauteshots.com/blog/2010/01/09/image-thievery/comment-page-1/#comment-10589</link>
		<dc:creator>stacie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 21:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hauteshots.net/blog/?p=2715#comment-10589</guid>
		<description>I posted the blog before I spoke with her. I am not trying to hurt anyone&#039;s image, but rather protect my image when someone else tried to adopt it as their own. Anyway, if you don&#039;t want to be labelled a thief, then don&#039;t steal. Simple really.

And, again, how was I supposed to know if she was really a photographer if she was using other people&#039;s images? Photographer&#039;s don&#039;t do that since we take plenty of our own shots to use and because we understand the legalities of running a legitimate business.

Nobody is attacking you. If anything you brought the comments on yourself by posting something utterly ridiculous and by being mean-spirited yourself. It upset people who do in fact understand right from wrong and they are just defending the person in the right here...me. They are upset about blatant stealing by your friend and by the fact that somebody (you) is actually trying to defend this. It&#039;s truly bizarre. 

I really hope you never have to deal with anyone stealing something from you this way, but unfortunately this may be the only way for you to understand right from wrong apparently. Kinda scary that there are people wandering around that think this sort of thing is ok. 

I just really can&#039;t believe you dragged this up again after so many months. I would be pretty upset about it if I was your friend. You only brought more attention to it by doing this. Next time maybe you should consider writing a nice email instead of a rude public blog comment.

I am not wasting any more of my time on this. Good luck to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted the blog before I spoke with her. I am not trying to hurt anyone&#8217;s image, but rather protect my image when someone else tried to adopt it as their own. Anyway, if you don&#8217;t want to be labelled a thief, then don&#8217;t steal. Simple really.</p>
<p>And, again, how was I supposed to know if she was really a photographer if she was using other people&#8217;s images? Photographer&#8217;s don&#8217;t do that since we take plenty of our own shots to use and because we understand the legalities of running a legitimate business.</p>
<p>Nobody is attacking you. If anything you brought the comments on yourself by posting something utterly ridiculous and by being mean-spirited yourself. It upset people who do in fact understand right from wrong and they are just defending the person in the right here&#8230;me. They are upset about blatant stealing by your friend and by the fact that somebody (you) is actually trying to defend this. It&#8217;s truly bizarre. </p>
<p>I really hope you never have to deal with anyone stealing something from you this way, but unfortunately this may be the only way for you to understand right from wrong apparently. Kinda scary that there are people wandering around that think this sort of thing is ok. </p>
<p>I just really can&#8217;t believe you dragged this up again after so many months. I would be pretty upset about it if I was your friend. You only brought more attention to it by doing this. Next time maybe you should consider writing a nice email instead of a rude public blog comment.</p>
<p>I am not wasting any more of my time on this. Good luck to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.hauteshots.com/blog/2010/01/09/image-thievery/comment-page-1/#comment-10584</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 01:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hauteshots.net/blog/?p=2715#comment-10584</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering why?..you say you spoke to her about the situation and she removed the images and yet you posted a blog about? You don&#039;t feel that is trying to hurt someone&#039;s image? (to me it seems like a lack of confidence). Your words: a ’so-called’ photographer 

As for all of you that felt the need to attack me, you are entitled to your opinion of me but in all honestly you don&#039;t know me and I don&#039;t know you either I was not leaving a post for you it was in reponse to a comment. 

Pamela: I&#039;m not mental challenged just typed a word wrong but you&#039;ve NEVER done that before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering why?..you say you spoke to her about the situation and she removed the images and yet you posted a blog about? You don&#8217;t feel that is trying to hurt someone&#8217;s image? (to me it seems like a lack of confidence). Your words: a ’so-called’ photographer </p>
<p>As for all of you that felt the need to attack me, you are entitled to your opinion of me but in all honestly you don&#8217;t know me and I don&#8217;t know you either I was not leaving a post for you it was in reponse to a comment. </p>
<p>Pamela: I&#8217;m not mental challenged just typed a word wrong but you&#8217;ve NEVER done that before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pamela</title>
		<link>http://www.hauteshots.com/blog/2010/01/09/image-thievery/comment-page-1/#comment-10569</link>
		<dc:creator>pamela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hauteshots.net/blog/?p=2715#comment-10569</guid>
		<description>Kat from Edmonton, you are obviously mentally challenged.
1st of all &quot;I know kaitlyne and she is an excellent photography&quot; doesn&#039;t even make sense.
and 2nd of all, Stacie never &quot;bashed&quot; another photographer&#039;s work.....she simply stated that it&#039;s in bad taste and probably a legal matter to steal someone else&#039;s work.
@ Stacie, I really think you should sue her and everyone else that tries some BS like this so eventually they will just stop it. your work is amazing and you have nothing to be insecure about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kat from Edmonton, you are obviously mentally challenged.<br />
1st of all &#8220;I know kaitlyne and she is an excellent photography&#8221; doesn&#8217;t even make sense.<br />
and 2nd of all, Stacie never &#8220;bashed&#8221; another photographer&#8217;s work&#8230;..she simply stated that it&#8217;s in bad taste and probably a legal matter to steal someone else&#8217;s work.<br />
@ Stacie, I really think you should sue her and everyone else that tries some BS like this so eventually they will just stop it. your work is amazing and you have nothing to be insecure about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauricio</title>
		<link>http://www.hauteshots.com/blog/2010/01/09/image-thievery/comment-page-1/#comment-10568</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauricio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hauteshots.net/blog/?p=2715#comment-10568</guid>
		<description>Oh and by the way; this one&#039;s a slam dunk. Easy case!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and by the way; this one&#8217;s a slam dunk. Easy case!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lysandra</title>
		<link>http://www.hauteshots.com/blog/2010/01/09/image-thievery/comment-page-1/#comment-10567</link>
		<dc:creator>Lysandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hauteshots.net/blog/?p=2715#comment-10567</guid>
		<description>I say SUE her, you can. Kat from Edmonton is obviously a naive girl that doesn&#039;t know any better. Silly children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say SUE her, you can. Kat from Edmonton is obviously a naive girl that doesn&#8217;t know any better. Silly children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stacie</title>
		<link>http://www.hauteshots.com/blog/2010/01/09/image-thievery/comment-page-1/#comment-10566</link>
		<dc:creator>stacie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hauteshots.net/blog/?p=2715#comment-10566</guid>
		<description>Thanks Heather. That was exactly my purpose of writing that. I would hate to think of anyone falling for this crap. We have been going after other photographers much harder than in this instance though. It&#039;s not a pleasant battle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Heather. That was exactly my purpose of writing that. I would hate to think of anyone falling for this crap. We have been going after other photographers much harder than in this instance though. It&#8217;s not a pleasant battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Vanek</title>
		<link>http://www.hauteshots.com/blog/2010/01/09/image-thievery/comment-page-1/#comment-10565</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Vanek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hauteshots.net/blog/?p=2715#comment-10565</guid>
		<description>The nerve of some people! This is why this keeps happening - because ignorant people seem to think it&#039;s ok. You went VERY easy on her, Stacie. Your blog entry was nothing more than a caution to consumers searching for a REPUTABLE photographer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nerve of some people! This is why this keeps happening &#8211; because ignorant people seem to think it&#8217;s ok. You went VERY easy on her, Stacie. Your blog entry was nothing more than a caution to consumers searching for a REPUTABLE photographer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauricio</title>
		<link>http://www.hauteshots.com/blog/2010/01/09/image-thievery/comment-page-1/#comment-10564</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauricio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hauteshots.net/blog/?p=2715#comment-10564</guid>
		<description>SUE HER! Get a copyright lawyer, if you can&#039;t find one let me know. This is not about talent or confidence this is about stealing people&#039;s property and messing up with other people&#039;s way to make a living, don&#039;t let her get away with it, Sue her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SUE HER! Get a copyright lawyer, if you can&#8217;t find one let me know. This is not about talent or confidence this is about stealing people&#8217;s property and messing up with other people&#8217;s way to make a living, don&#8217;t let her get away with it, Sue her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stacie</title>
		<link>http://www.hauteshots.com/blog/2010/01/09/image-thievery/comment-page-1/#comment-10558</link>
		<dc:creator>stacie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hauteshots.net/blog/?p=2715#comment-10558</guid>
		<description>Hi Kat from Edmonton,

I&#039;m not sure how I bashed Kaitlyn&#039;s work (I&#039;ve never even seen it!) by doing anything other than stating the truth...she falsely advertised boudoir services while using other photographers images, including mine. How can you possibly defend this? And I definitely am not appreciating your rude comment about me when I am the one who was wronged in this situation. I did &lt;em&gt;nothing&lt;/em&gt; to warrant rude comments. And, believe me, I was VERY easy on Kaitlyn with this issue. I still have screenshots of the theft though if you would rather me take it up legally. 

A professional photographer would &lt;em&gt;never&lt;/em&gt; dream of using someone else&#039;s hard work to advertise their own business. Totally unheard of. And, you say she is an excellent photographer? How could I possibly base an opinion on that when she was using other photographers images on the website she had up? Granted she took the website down after I was notified of image theft and sent her a cease and desist email.

In the world of professional photographers, image theft is absolutely unacceptable. I think it is even worst to use stolen boudoir images though for many reasons: 
1. These images are of an intimate nature!
2. The clients whose images appear on my website sign release forms to me and ONLY me to use the images. They did not give &lt;em&gt;her&lt;/em&gt;, or anyone else for that matter, permission to use them. I built a relationship with my clients and &lt;em&gt;they&lt;/em&gt; are of my utmost concern - not someone wanting to skip the hard work involved in building a boudoir business.
3. It&#039;s fraudulent. It is selling a service or a talent that cannot be recreated...my images can only be created by me. This is VERY deceitful to anyone looking to have boudoir images taken for their significant other. They are trusting that the photographer they chose actually shot the images in the gallery they used to base their decision on after spending a lot of time researching every photographer in their area. Photographers have different styles, skills and abilities and if someone steals an image and is then hired based on that work, they won&#039;t be able to produce a &lt;em&gt;full session&lt;/em&gt; of compatible images that the client hired them to do in the first place.
4. If any sessions were sold based on stolen images from responsible, hard-working, professional photographers then that is a stolen client too.
5. I worked hard to build my own portfolio and other photographers should do the same, dang it!

I am sorry you take offense to this, Kat. I am pretty bewildered by it, if truth be told. But, I don&#039;t feel that I need to apologize for any wrong-doing in this situation and find it incredibly curious that you would post this comment to &lt;em&gt;my&lt;/em&gt; blog.

Best of luck to you,

Stacie

P.S. I&#039;m pretty confident about my work, thanks. Although, as any &#039;creative&#039; (or woman...lol) will tell you, confidence ebbs and flows. We are our own worst critics. But, my clients are all happy so I must be doing something right! Not to mention how many times other photographers have stolen my images....they must be of some value, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kat from Edmonton,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how I bashed Kaitlyn&#8217;s work (I&#8217;ve never even seen it!) by doing anything other than stating the truth&#8230;she falsely advertised boudoir services while using other photographers images, including mine. How can you possibly defend this? And I definitely am not appreciating your rude comment about me when I am the one who was wronged in this situation. I did <em>nothing</em> to warrant rude comments. And, believe me, I was VERY easy on Kaitlyn with this issue. I still have screenshots of the theft though if you would rather me take it up legally. </p>
<p>A professional photographer would <em>never</em> dream of using someone else&#8217;s hard work to advertise their own business. Totally unheard of. And, you say she is an excellent photographer? How could I possibly base an opinion on that when she was using other photographers images on the website she had up? Granted she took the website down after I was notified of image theft and sent her a cease and desist email.</p>
<p>In the world of professional photographers, image theft is absolutely unacceptable. I think it is even worst to use stolen boudoir images though for many reasons:<br />
1. These images are of an intimate nature!<br />
2. The clients whose images appear on my website sign release forms to me and ONLY me to use the images. They did not give <em>her</em>, or anyone else for that matter, permission to use them. I built a relationship with my clients and <em>they</em> are of my utmost concern &#8211; not someone wanting to skip the hard work involved in building a boudoir business.<br />
3. It&#8217;s fraudulent. It is selling a service or a talent that cannot be recreated&#8230;my images can only be created by me. This is VERY deceitful to anyone looking to have boudoir images taken for their significant other. They are trusting that the photographer they chose actually shot the images in the gallery they used to base their decision on after spending a lot of time researching every photographer in their area. Photographers have different styles, skills and abilities and if someone steals an image and is then hired based on that work, they won&#8217;t be able to produce a <em>full session</em> of compatible images that the client hired them to do in the first place.<br />
4. If any sessions were sold based on stolen images from responsible, hard-working, professional photographers then that is a stolen client too.<br />
5. I worked hard to build my own portfolio and other photographers should do the same, dang it!</p>
<p>I am sorry you take offense to this, Kat. I am pretty bewildered by it, if truth be told. But, I don&#8217;t feel that I need to apologize for any wrong-doing in this situation and find it incredibly curious that you would post this comment to <em>my</em> blog.</p>
<p>Best of luck to you,</p>
<p>Stacie</p>
<p>P.S. I&#8217;m pretty confident about my work, thanks. Although, as any &#8216;creative&#8217; (or woman&#8230;lol) will tell you, confidence ebbs and flows. We are our own worst critics. But, my clients are all happy so I must be doing something right! Not to mention how many times other photographers have stolen my images&#8230;.they must be of some value, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat from. Edmonton</title>
		<link>http://www.hauteshots.com/blog/2010/01/09/image-thievery/comment-page-1/#comment-10557</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat from. Edmonton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hauteshots.net/blog/?p=2715#comment-10557</guid>
		<description>I know kaitlyne and she is an excellent photography. Too bad you are so unconfident in your work that you need to bash other peoples work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know kaitlyne and she is an excellent photography. Too bad you are so unconfident in your work that you need to bash other peoples work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

